Sharing Results with Stakeholders

Overview

Effectively communicating marketing mix modeling results requires tailoring your presentation to your audience's technical background, business priorities, and decision-making needs. This guide provides strategies for sharing MixModeler outputs with different stakeholder groups.

Know Your Audience

Executive Leadership

Priorities: Bottom-line impact, strategic direction, budget allocation

Preferred Format: High-level summary, visual charts, clear recommendations

Technical Level: Minimal statistics, focus on business implications

Key Questions:

  • Which channels drive the most revenue?

  • Where should we invest more/less?

  • What's the expected ROI of budget reallocation?

Marketing Teams

Priorities: Channel performance, campaign optimization, tactical decisions

Preferred Format: Detailed attribution, channel comparisons, time-series trends

Technical Level: Moderate - understand marketing metrics, some statistics

Key Questions:

  • How do my channels compare to each other?

  • Which campaigns performed best?

  • What's the optimal budget split?

Finance Teams

Priorities: ROI, cost efficiency, budget justification

Preferred Format: Numerical tables, cost-benefit analysis, variance explanations

Technical Level: High numerical literacy, less marketing context

Key Questions:

  • What's the ROI of each channel?

  • Can we justify current marketing spend levels?

  • Where can we cut costs with minimal impact?

Data Science / Analytics Teams

Priorities: Methodology, statistical validity, model quality

Preferred Format: Full technical details, diagnostics, assumptions, limitations

Technical Level: High - understands statistics, modeling, diagnostics

Key Questions:

  • Did the model pass diagnostic tests?

  • What are the assumptions and limitations?

  • How robust are the results?

Preparing Exports for Different Audiences

For Executives

Create Summary Excel:

  1. Export full model to Excel

  2. Add new "Executive Summary" sheet at the beginning

  3. Include only:

    • Top 5-10 most important coefficients

    • Simple ROI calculations

    • Clear recommendations

  4. Use visual formatting (colors, bold, conditional formatting)

  5. Add 1-2 key charts (channel contribution pie chart, ROI bar chart)

Example Summary Sheet:

Channel
Monthly Spend
Coefficient
ROI
Recommendation

TV

$50,000

3.25

6.5x

Increase

Digital

$30,000

2.18

7.3x

Increase

Print

$20,000

0.45

2.3x

Maintain

Radio

$15,000

0.12

0.8x

Reduce

Talking Points:

  • "Our analysis shows digital and TV deliver the highest ROI"

  • "We recommend shifting $5K from radio to digital for 15% revenue increase"

  • "Model explains 85% of revenue variation, very strong fit"

For Marketing Teams

Create Marketing Dashboard:

  1. Export with decomposition included

  2. Focus on Group Decomposition sheet

  3. Create time-series charts showing:

    • Each channel's contribution over time

    • Seasonal patterns

    • Performance trends

  4. Add channel comparison tables

  5. Include variable-level details for campaign analysis

Example Marketing View:

  • Stacked area chart of contributions over time

  • Table of average weekly contribution by channel

  • Campaign-level performance (if using campaign variables)

  • Optimization recommendations with specific spend allocations

Talking Points:

  • "TV drives 35% of attributed revenue on average"

  • "Digital performance improved 20% in Q4 vs Q3"

  • "We see clear seasonality in December - 40% higher effectiveness"

For Finance Teams

Create Finance Package:

  1. Export full model

  2. Highlight Model Statistics sheet

  3. Create ROI calculation sheet:

    • Coefficient × average spend / average KPI

    • Cost per incremental unit (revenue, conversion, etc.)

    • Marginal ROI calculations

  4. Add variance analysis

  5. Include sensitivity scenarios

Example ROI Sheet:

Channel
Avg Monthly Spend
Coefficient
Incremental KPI
Cost per Unit
ROI

TV

$50,000

3.25

$162,500

$0.31

325%

Digital

$30,000

2.18

$65,400

$0.46

218%

Talking Points:

  • "Every dollar in TV generates $3.25 in revenue"

  • "Model R² of 0.85 means highly reliable estimates"

  • "Reallocating 20% of print budget to digital projects +$12K revenue/month"

For Technical Teams

Provide Complete Package:

  1. Full Excel export (all sheets)

  2. PDF diagnostic reports for all tests

  3. Documentation of:

    • Data sources and preparation

    • Variable transformations applied

    • Prior specifications (if Bayesian)

    • Model selection rationale

  4. Code/methodology notes

Include:

  • Diagnostic test results

  • Convergence metrics (Bayesian)

  • Residual analysis

  • Multicollinearity assessment

  • Assumptions and limitations

Talking Points:

  • "Model passes all diagnostic tests (normality, autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity)"

  • "VIF values all below 5, no multicollinearity concerns"

  • "Bayesian model converged (R-hat < 1.01, ESS > 1000)"

Creating Effective Presentations

PowerPoint Structure

Slide 1: Executive Summary

  • Key findings (3-5 bullets)

  • Top recommendation

  • Expected business impact

Slide 2: Methodology Overview (1 slide only)

  • What is MMM (2-3 sentences)

  • Data used (time period, channels included)

  • Model quality (R², sample size)

Slide 3-4: Channel Performance

  • Bar chart of coefficients or ROI by channel

  • Table with key metrics

  • Performance ranking

Slide 5-6: Attribution Over Time

  • Stacked area chart from decomposition

  • Trend insights

  • Seasonal patterns

Slide 7: Recommendations

  • Specific actions (increase X, decrease Y)

  • Expected impact with numbers

  • Implementation timeline

Slide 8: Q&A / Appendix

  • Technical details

  • Methodology notes

  • Diagnostic results

Visualization Best Practices

Use Bar Charts for comparing channels:

  • Simple, clear comparison

  • Easy to rank performance

  • Intuitive for non-technical audiences

Use Stacked Area Charts for attribution over time:

  • Shows contribution dynamics

  • Reveals seasonal patterns

  • Communicates total and breakdown simultaneously

Use Pie Charts sparingly:

  • Overall attribution share

  • Budget allocation

  • Only when 3-7 categories

Avoid:

  • Complex scatter plots (unless technical audience)

  • Statistical diagnostic charts (appendix only)

  • 3D charts (harder to read)

Color Coding Strategy

Consistent Channel Colors:

  • Assign each channel a color

  • Use same colors across all charts

  • Match decomposition group colors in MixModeler

Example Color Scheme:

  • TV: Blue

  • Digital: Orange

  • Print: Green

  • Radio: Red

  • Base/Other: Gray

Performance Indicators:

  • Green highlight: High performers, increase budget

  • Yellow highlight: Moderate performers, maintain

  • Red highlight: Low performers, reduce budget

Storytelling with Data

Structure Your Narrative

1. Set Context

  • "We analyzed 2 years of data across 8 marketing channels"

  • "Goal: Understand which channels drive revenue most effectively"

2. Present Findings

  • "Model shows 85% of revenue variation explained by marketing activities"

  • "Top 3 channels: Digital (7.3x ROI), TV (6.5x ROI), Events (5.8x ROI)"

3. Reveal Insights

  • "Digital effectiveness increased 40% after campaign refresh in Q3"

  • "TV has strong holiday seasonality - 60% more effective in Q4"

4. Make Recommendations

  • "Shift $50K from low-ROI print to high-ROI digital"

  • "Increase TV spend 20% during Q4 holiday season"

5. Quantify Impact

  • "Expected revenue increase: $180K annually"

  • "Improves overall marketing ROI from 4.2x to 5.1x"

Use Analogies and Metaphors

For Coefficients:

  • "For every dollar spent on TV, we generate $3.25 in revenue - like a 225% return on investment"

For Adstock:

  • "TV advertising is like a wave - the effect builds over 3-4 weeks, then gradually fades"

For Saturation:

  • "Digital ads show diminishing returns - doubling spend doesn't double results"

For Model Fit:

  • "The model explains 85% of revenue changes - like having an 85% accurate crystal ball"

Addressing Common Questions

"How accurate is this?"

Answer:

  • "The model R² of 0.85 means it explains 85% of revenue variation"

  • "We validated results with statistical tests - all passed"

  • "Typical prediction error is ±8%, well within acceptable range"

"Why didn't you include [X channel]?"

Answer:

  • "We included all channels with consistent, reliable data"

  • "Channels with limited data or recent launches analyzed separately"

  • "Can add new channels in next model iteration as data accumulates"

"These ROI numbers seem high/low"

Answer:

  • "ROI reflects incremental impact, not total impact"

  • "Numbers align with industry benchmarks for [sector]"

  • "Results validated against actual spend and revenue data"

"Can we trust the recommendations?"

Answer:

  • "Model passed all diagnostic tests for statistical validity"

  • "Results consistent across multiple model specifications"

  • "Recommend testing with gradual budget shifts, monitor results"

"What about external factors?"

Answer:

  • "Model includes seasonality, trends, and control variables"

  • "Isolates marketing impact from other business drivers"

  • "Regular updates will capture changing market conditions"

Handling Sensitive Information

What to Share Externally

Safe to Share:

  • Relative channel performance (rankings)

  • ROI ratios and multiples

  • Model methodology and approach

  • Directional recommendations

Redact Before Sharing:

  • Absolute spend amounts

  • Actual revenue numbers

  • Specific coefficients (if proprietary)

  • Competitive intelligence

Creating Anonymized Versions

Technique 1: Percentages

  • Convert absolute spend to % of total

  • Report relative contributions

  • Use indexed values (base year = 100)

Technique 2: Ratios Only

  • Report ROI multiples

  • Share efficiency metrics

  • Provide performance rankings

Technique 3: Illustrative Scenarios

  • "If we shift 10% of budget from Channel A to Channel B..."

  • Use hypothetical numbers that preserve insights

Follow-Up and Action

Schedule Review Meeting

Within 1 Week: Present findings

Within 2 Weeks: Finalize recommendations

Within 1 Month: Begin implementation

Quarterly: Review results, update model

Document Decisions

Create Decision Log:

  • What was recommended

  • What was decided

  • Rationale for any deviations

  • Expected vs actual results (track over time)

Enable Self-Service

For Ongoing Questions:

  • Share annotated Excel export

  • Provide one-page summary

  • Create FAQ document

  • Offer follow-up session

Best Practices Summary

Tailor Content: Match detail level to audience technical sophistication

Lead with Insights: Business implications first, methodology second

Use Visuals: Charts communicate faster than tables

Tell a Story: Context → Findings → Insights → Recommendations → Impact

Be Transparent: Share limitations, assumptions, and uncertainty

Quantify Impact: Always translate findings into business metrics

Enable Action: Clear, specific, prioritized recommendations

Follow Through: Track implementation, measure results, iterate


Next Steps: Explore Model Reimport to reload models for future analysis, or review Excel Export Features for creating custom stakeholder reports.

Last updated